Kenneth Pomeranz’s The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the. Making of the Modern World Economy is an important and excel lent book. Any review that . The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy. [Kenneth Pomeranz] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying. The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy Kenneth Pomeranz Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, , ISBN.
|Published (Last):||24 August 2006|
|PDF File Size:||6.7 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.80 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
A Study in Historical National Accounting, “. Views Read Edit View history. The historian Jeffrey G. Economic historian Jean Batou argues that the necessary economic conditions for rapid industrialization existed in Egypt during the s—s.
Furthermore, recent research into world trade in bullion has clarified the importance of the complex and multifaceted role played by Chinese, Indian and South East Asian demand for New World silver in maintaining the profitability and momentum of European investment in the Americas for some two centuries before the Industrial Revolution.
The high-level equilibrium trap theory argues that China did not undergo an indigenous industrial revolution since its economy was in a stable equilibrium, where supply and demand for labor were equal, disincentivizing the development of labor-saving capital. Between Development and Underdevelopment: On the other hand, Europe’s geography favored balkanization into smaller, closer, nation-states, as its many natural barriers mountains, rivers provide defensible borders.
Ten Years of Debate on the Origins of the Great Divergence | Reviews in History
As a result, governments that suppressed economic and technological progress soon corrected their mistakes or were out-competed relatively quickly. Of the developed cores of the Old worldIndia was distinguished by its caste system of bound labor, which hampered economic and population growth and resulted in relative underdevelopment compared to other core regions. Egypt also imported coal from overseas, at similar prices to what imported coal cost in France, until the s, when Cairo gained access to coal sources in Lebanonwhich had a yearly coal output of 4, tons.
Pomerwnz brief, the rise of material culture in Europe has been linked, in carefully specified ways, to intercontinental trade and colonization to changes in consumption and investment and to the patterns of work by European households. His estimates show that the GDP per capita of Western European countries rose rapidly after industrialization.
By the Song period, the Scholar-officials themselves were using intermediary agents to participate in trading. Cox argues in a study, . Secondly, and on any recasting and reconfiguration of the data, now available to measure the kwnneth of intercontinental commerce, standard exercises in national income accountancy are unlikely to provide persuasively large ratios. Religion in global civil society. A number of economic historians have posited that the Industrial Revolution may have partly occurred where and when it did due to luck and chance.
This page was last edited on 18 December freat, at The trade imbalance caused Europeans to export digergence quantities of gold and silver to India in order djvergence pay for Indian imports. Notable economists and thinkers within economics. In contrast, he cites the Ottoman Empire as an example of a state that did have free trade, which he argues had a negative economic impact and contributed to its deindustrialization.
Peter Cain and Mark Harrison 3 vols. Max Weber argued in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit vreat Capitalism that capitalism in northern Europe evolved when the Protestant work ethic particularly Calvinist influenced large numbers of people to hreat in work in the secular world, developing their own enterprises and engaging in trade and the accumulation of wealth for investment. He argues that China, too, had competitive markets and an elaborate legal system of property rights; in contrast, he also notes the plethora of institutions and laws antithetical to capitalist enterprise, ranging from apprenticeship laws to actual serfdom, that hampered economic development in Europe.
Thus in England both agricultural productivity and population growth were subject to market pressures throughout the early modern period.
Once again, the scale of imports in relation to total consumption of indigenous fibres becomes important later rather than earlier in the 19th century.
Economics and World History: A gfeat argument is that Europe had more free and efficient markets than other civilizations, which has been cited as a reason for the Great Divergence. Eric Jones, Growth Recurring.
Economic systems Microfoundations Mathematical economics Econometrics Computational economics Experimental economics Publications. The Dutch Republic was controlled by merchants, while Parliament gained control of England after a long struggle culminating in the Glorious Revolution.
In contrast, Britain contained some of the largest coal deposits in Europe  – all within a relatively compact island. Economic Change in World History Oxford, In the Age of Exploration navigators discovered new routes to the Americas and Asia. Europe’s access to a larger quantity of raw materials and a larger market to sell its manufactured goods gave it a distinct advantage through the 19th century.
Similarly for Ottoman Egyptits per-capita income in was comparable to that of leading Western European countries such as Franceand higher than the overall average income of Europe and Japan.
Volumes imported fluctuated but increased on trend. Technological advances, in areas such as railroadssteamboatsminingand agriculturewere embraced to a higher degree in the West than the East during the Great Divergence. Why the West got rich and the Middle East did not?
Mortality and Living Standards in Europe and Asiaed. Western world and culture.
Reinhard Bendix, Max Weber. References to geology, geography and transportation ths do not seem to be sufficient to explain why China remained virtually an outsider throughout the age of steam?
The Confusions of Pleasure: Since the midth century, northern China’s water supplies have been declining, reducing its agricultural output. China and Modern Capitalismed.
The location of major coal deposits was a critical factor in determining the viability of industrialization. He claims that advanced cultures outside Europe had developed in areas whose geography was conducive to large, monolithic, isolated empires. Nevertheless, a national accounts framework continues to be the only divergemce perspective available to historians who wish to specify and quantify the overall significance of variables, such as intercontinental exports and imports for national and European wide rates of capital formation and structural change and innovation from to Finally, to return to Adam Smith and overseas expansion europeans not Chinese, Arabs or Indians discovered conquered, infected, gdeat, colonized and eventually established mutually beneficial, commercial relationships with the Americas.
In the Orient, imperial states had virtually no fiscal or other interest in the promotion of commerce and colonization that might in the fullness of time pay for itself in the form of imported and taxable luxuries. During its early stages tenuous and not highly significant connexions can be constructed pomerabz intercontinental commerce on the one hand and the substitution of coal-based forms of heat and power for traditional divwrgence of energy derived from wood, wind, water, animals and human muscles on the other.
Yet there is certainly a more nuanced but less dramatic argument to be made for the importance of supplies of slave produced cotton fibres, namely greeat cheap raw materials promoted the growth of one major manufacturing industry in Europe and that the engineering problems involved in the mechanization of spinning and weaving cloth were more easily solved with fibres with the tensile properties of cotton, than thrown silk not so clear!
Fortunately, through improved farming techniques, the import of fertilizersand reforestationEuropeans were able to recondition their soil and prevent food shortages from hampering industrialization.
Thd Yifu Lin divergehce that China’s large population size proved beneficial in technological advancements prior to the 14th century, but that the large population size was not an important factor in the kind of technological advancements that resulted in the Industrial Revolution.