HANS VAIHINGER DIE PHILOSOPHIE DES ALS OB PDF

noch einmal korrekturgelesen. Sie enthält jetzt im Anhang die Festschrift „Ist die Philosophie des Als Ob Religionsfeindlich?“ by Hans Vaihinger (Author). Die Philosophie Des ALS OB by Hans Vaihinger, , available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide. PDF | The paper contains a detailed exposition and analysis of the Philosophie des Als Ob, proposed by Hans Vahinger in The conclusion: Vaihinger was .

Author: Felkree Tektilar
Country: Bhutan
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Marketing
Published (Last): 2 January 2013
Pages: 443
PDF File Size: 18.66 Mb
ePub File Size: 10.53 Mb
ISBN: 635-8-99032-286-9
Downloads: 59449
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Fenrile

At the bottom of the article, feel free to list any sources that support your changes, so that dei can fully understand their context. Frederick Gregory – – Zygon 43 3: Studies in the Theory of Fiction with a New Epilogue. Max Wundt – – Kant-Studien He published with Friedrich Engels ….

Hans Vaihinger

Keep Exploring Britannica Sigmund Freud. Frank Kermode ‘s The Sense of an Ending was an early de of Vaihinger as a useful methodologist of narrativity. This article has no associated abstract. The Philosophy of ‘As if’.

However, the interest of literary scholars has continued modestly with the publication of some recent “Vaihinger-inflected critical literature”. This page was last edited on 23 Octoberat In particular, he used examples from the physical sciences, such as protonselectronsand electromagnetic waves.

  CGEGIS 1980 PDF

Die Philosophie Des ALS OB : Hans Vaihinger :

The book produced immediately a great impression. Outlines of a Comparative Individualistic Psychology and Psychotherapy. Views Read Edit View history. Aristotle, ancient Greek philosopher and scientist, one of the greatest intellectual figures of Western….

In Die Philosophie des Als ObVaihinger argued that human beings can never really know the underlying reality of the world, and that as a result we construct systems of thought and then assume that these match reality: Ogden, at the very end of his life.

Raoul Richter – – Philosophical Review He finds it open to criticism on the grounds that it involves a covert appeal to a non-pragmatic concept of truth. Spirwhich I started immediately to study diligently.

When, inhis Philosophy of As If was published in English, the original book was already in its sixth edition. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. The chief defect of Vaihinger’s monumental work was its failure to lay stress on the linguistic factor in the creation of fictions. Mencken was scathing in his criticism of the book, which he dismissed as an unimportant “foot-note to all existing systems”.

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University’s proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy. Learn More in these related Britannica articles: This page was last edited on 10 Septemberat The Philosophy of ‘As if’: The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Unfortunately, our editorial approach may not be able to accommodate all contributions.

  KATO SS500 PDF

Find it on Scholar.

In other projects Wikimedia Commons. He then became a tutor and later a philosophy professor at the University of Strasbourgbefore moving in to the University of Hallewhere from he was a full professor.

De die Philosophie des Als Ob Skeptizismus? Monthly downloads Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

You may find it helpful to search within the site to see how similar or related subjects are covered. During his own diie Vaihinger’s works were generally well received both in Germany and abroad, especially in America.

Hans Vaihinger | German philosopher |

The American journalist H. The revised translation was based on the sixth German edition of the original work. Thought begins with slight initial deviations from reality half-fictionsand, becoming bolder dei bolder, ends by operating with constructs that are not only opposed to the facts but are self-contradictory.